Close Menu
  • Telugu today
  • తాజా వార్తలు
  • వార్తలు
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Gamble Caribbean Hold’em Casino poker on the internet pokie
  • Better No deposit Local casino Bonuses 2024 » 100 percent free Bucks & Free Spins
  • The Increase of Student-Driven Encyclopedias: Changing Understanding Landscapes
  • Finest Cellular Casinos: Greatest Us Cellular Gambling enterprise Applications and Advertisements within the 2025
  • Best Mobile Web based poker Software the real deal Cash on apple’s ios & Android os within the 2025
  • Greatest ten Online gambling Programs for real Cash in 2025
  • Casino utan svensk licens 2025 – Topp 10 casino utan Spelpaus
  • Bet with Sahabet 💰 Bonus up to 10000 Rupees 💰 Play Online Casino Games
Telangana Press
  • Telugu today
  • తాజా వార్తలు
  • వార్తలు
Telangana Press
Telugu today

Telangana High Court dismisses SBI’s plea against Sebi

TelanganapressBy TelanganapressJune 15, 2023No Comments

Two Telangana High Court judges reject SBI’s claim that it is better than market watchdog to recover amounts from defaulters

Published Date – 06:20 AM, Thu – 15 June 23

Telangana High Court dismisses SBI's plea against Sebi

file photo

Hyderabad: Two judges of the Telangana High Court comprising Justice P Naveen Rao and Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka dismissed two writ petitions filed by SBI against Sebi. The bench dismissed SBI’s claim that it had the upper hand over the market watchdog in recovering amounts from defaulters.

The issue concerns two private companies, Midfield Industries and SVCL Pvt Limited, which secured loans from SBI in 2004 and 2006 against immovable properties. As the company defaulted and the loan was declared NPA, SBI initiated recovery proceedings under the Sarfaesi Act.

However, the same was challenged by the SBI when the sub-registrar refused to register the property in the name of the successful bidder, citing the prohibition order passed by Sebi. The bank said it should be prioritized in the recovery as it disbursed loans long before Sebi issued the 2020 moratorium. It also noted that the Sarfaesi Act and the RDB Act have a non-fixed clause, so it will take precedence over the SEBI Act.

Sebi, on the other hand, argues that the present case does not fall under the non-positive clause. Sebi argued that these entities committed breaches early on, issued such notices and now SBI cannot accept such requests. Sebi said the ban was passed to protect hundreds of thousands of investors.

bail denied

Judge K Lakshman refused to grant early bail to the owner of the city’s Stylish Spa. Ramawath Swathi faces charges of operating prostitution under the guise of a spa business. Lawyers for the petitioner argued that this was a bogus case and said the petitioner has all valid licenses to operate the spa.

The lawyer also pointed out that CCTV footage could be inspected. Prosecutors argued the matter involved trafficking of married women. He said the case was still under investigation and opposed granting bail, saying the petitioner, if released, could influence witnesses and tamper with evidence.

Source link

Telanganapress
  • Website

Related Posts

KCR’s speech gets roaring response from people-Telangana Today

April 16, 2024

More of the same-Telangana Today

April 16, 2024

Property tax cheques bounce, GHMC takes action-Telangana Today

April 16, 2024
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Categories
  • 1
  • AI News
  • News
  • Telugu today
  • Uncategorized
  • తాజా వార్తలు
  • వార్తలు
కాపీరైట్ © 2024 Telanganapress.com సర్వ హక్కులు ప్రత్యేకించబడినవి.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About us
  • Contact us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.